IRISH BEACH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMITTEE

PO Box 245 Manchester, CA 95459

(707) 882-3183   ibadc@ibiclub.com    ibiclub.com

MINUTES for November 18, 2006

Open meeting beginning at 10:00am at the Irish Beach Firehouse, 15401 Forest View Drive.

 

CALL TO ORDER

 

The meeting was called to order at 10:05AM. 

IBADC members present:  Chairperson Leon Drolet, Nik Epanchin, Gordon Moores and Walt Rush. 

Others in attendance:  Karen Bailey, Glenn Coleman, Darryl Datwyler, Kathy Edelbrock, Dorothy Engle, Dan Glen, Bob and Dina Hoffman, Dan & Marsha Moore, Betsy and George Munson, David Paoli, David A. Paoli, Richard Pate, Michael Powell, Elizabeth Robards, Patrick and Sharon Robards, Rod and Melissa Scheaffer, Shervin Tajbaksh, Al & Loretta Thompson, Jim and Lu Vickery, Suzanne Whitaker, Bettye and Bob Winters, Bob Yazell.

 

APPROVE MINUTES/TREASURER’S REPORT:

Minutes-7/15/06 and 9/16/06:  Nik Epanchin moved to approve the minutes of 7/15/06 and Gordon Moores seconded.  The motion passed 2-0 with Leon Drolet and Walt Rush abstaining because they did not attend the meeting.  Gordon moved to approve the minutes of 9/16/06.  Leon seconded and the motion passed 2-0 with Walt and Nik abstaining. 

Treasurer’s Report:  9/1/06-11/15/06:  The IBADC has repaid the $1000 loan taken out from IBIC last spring and now has net assets of $3090.02.

Click here to view Treasurer's Report 

Nik moved to approve the report, Walt seconded and the motion passed 4-0.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Hearings for New Home Construction and Major Exterior Modification permits will be limited to 45 minutes; 15 minutes for presentation and Committee questions and 30 minutes for audience input and discussion. 

 

PROPOSED CHANGE TO ALL BUILDING PROCEDURES:  The Committee proposes the following addition to the existing published procedures:  “The IBADC shall deny issuing any permit if current violations to the CC&Rs exist on the property in question and correction of such violations are not addressed in the permit request.”  Leon explained that, at the time of applying for a permit, the IBADC will inspect the property for any infractions to the CC&Rs such as exterior lighting, color, etc. If violations are found, they must be rectified during the construction permit period. The version of CC&Rs in force at the time of the original construction will be used for determining violations.  The proposal will be emailed and mailed to property owners and posted on the web site.  Community members are encouraged to comment.  A vote for approval will be taken at the January IBADC meeting.  If approved, a second mailing will be made to those owners who are currently in violation of CC&Rs. The first item to be addressed will be unshielded exterior lighting.  The Committee will also solicit ideas to address the issue of owner/builders who intend to take much longer to complete exterior construction than is presently allowed for in the IBADC building procedures. 

 

HOFFMAN 1/052 (14780 Navarro Way):  Phase II New Home Construction permit application.  Mr. Hoffman presented the application.  The proposed 2 bedroom 2 bath 1854ft2 home is placed on the westerly portion of the lot and is angled to the to get a southwest view.  Decks are 2.5ft off the ground.  Mr. Hoffman explained that the west side yard set back is 6ft from the shared property line with lot 1/053 (Gardner) and that the Gardners have agreed to the proposed building envelope in a written and notarized statement.  The Gardners’ home is 42.5ft from the shared property line and the septic system lies between it and the Hoffman lot.  Mr. Hoffman explained that they have not been able to contact the Gardners to complete the process of attaching the notarized statement to the property deed, as required by the Committee (minutes 4/14/06 and 5/20/06).  He expressed his concern that they may be reluctant to do so because the house is for sale.  Gordon explained that the notarized statement of agreement is worded incorrectly and should say that the Gardners agree to maintain a 22ft set back.  After discussion, the Committee noted that although the document is not worded properly, it clearly states the Gardners agreement to the proposed 6ft set back.  The Committee also noted that the Gardners are aware of the proposed set back and the 28ft building separation requirement and have not made an objection; therefore, the existing statement is sufficient.  Gordon stated that the CC&Rs require plans for a 2-car garage and the plans show a one car detached garage and shop.  Mr. Hoffman suggested that the garage could be enlarged by extending the southwest corner to the west, which will make it large enough for two cars.  The Committee suggested widening the proposed 12ft off street parking area by moving the garbage enclosure south.  The propane tank, garbage enclosure and parking area must be screened to about waist high with landscaping or trellising.  The exterior lights must be shielded and downcast.  White trim or windows will not be approved.  Walt moved to approve the application conditioned upon receipt of the corrected drawings within 60 days.  The time limit is extended beyond the usual 15 working days due to conditions beyond the applicant’s control.  Nik amended the motion to state that the corrections only need to be redlined on the drawings to show a 2-car garage screened parking area, propane tank and garbage enclosure, indication of roofing material and confirmation of a 4:12 roof pitch.  When this is received, the Committee will issue a Provisional Permit, which the applicant can use to pursue the needed County permits.  Gordon seconded the amendment, which passed 4-0.  Gordon then seconded the amended motion, which also passed 4-0.  The Provisional Permit is valid for 1 year, with the possibility of two renewals and the issue date will be the date the redlined drawings are received.  A Construction Permit will be issued when final construction drawings are submitted, reviewed and signed by the Committee members.   

 

DAN AND MARSHA MOORE 7/09 (44520 O’Rorey’s Pl.):  Revised Phase I Major Exterior Modification application with set back variance for the construction of a garage.  Architect Glenn Coleman presented the revised application.  The building envelope was established at the 9/16/06 meeting.  He explained that the area of the proposed front yard set back variance is 6ft 6in. larger than previously requested which will allow for the construction of a 2-car garage.  The Moores have already submitted the Phase II application and Gordon stated his objection to the profile of the proposed garage because is exceeds the height of the existing fin wall.  A lengthy discussion followed but no action was taken.  Walt moved to approve the front yard set back variance as proposed.  Nik seconded the motion, which passed 4-0.  

 

TAJBAKSH/POWELL 3/13 (14600 Cypress Point Rd.):  Revised Phase I New Home Construction permit application.  Shervin Tajbaksh, owner/architect, presented the application.  He explained that the application now has complete topographic data.  (See minutes of 9/16/06)  The standard set backs are maintained with the exception of a 6ft side yard setback from the shared property line of lot 3/14 (Tonningsen).  The previously requested 6ft set back with 3/19 (Yazell) is withdrawn and the minimum 16ft set back will be observed.  The Tonningsens have submitted a letter stating their agreement to the proposed set back and stating that they will not build within 26ft of the shared property line in order to maintain the required 32ft building separation.  Nik moved to approve the application as presented.  Walt seconded and the motion passed 4-0.  The source of the survey data should be included in the Phase II application.

 

SCHEAFFER 2/21 (Pomo Lake Dr.):  Revised Phase I New Home Construction permit application.  The application was first heard on 9/16/06 and sent back for revisions.  David Paoli, designer, presented the application.  Mr. Paoli explained that the east set back is now 14ft from the property line with 2/22 (Robards) instead of 6ft.  The view corridor is revised to include analysis of the Robards ocean view to the northwest.  While the view is from the master bedroom and not the living area as defined in the CC&Rs, Mr. Paoli believes the ocean view will be retained with the proposed building envelope.  The building envelope, not including the garage, is 1300ft2.  In response to questions, Lisa Schaeffer explained that they do not wish to seek a County variance to the 100ft riparian set back.  Nik moved to approve the application as presented.  Walt seconded the motion, which passed 4-0.

 

COMMUNICATIONS:

 

MCP:  10/12/06 ADC letter to MCP requesting the name of the corporate spokesperson.  No response has been received to date.  The intent of the letter is to learn who has the authority to speak for the corporation.

 

MEDIATION REQUEST:  10/4/06  Letter from William Moores stating his disagreement with the ADC’s rejection of his mediation request (minutes 9/16/06).  The Committee responded with a letters dated 10/12/06 and 11/3/06 clarifying the Committee’s decision not to proceed with mediation unless both parties agree to follow the existing guidelines.


 

BUTERA 2/07 (44881 Arena Circle):  10/12/06 Receipt of verification of foundation location and revised construction drawings.  Nik explained that the foundation is improperly placed at 6ft from the east property line while the drawings call for placement at 7ft with a 1ft eave overhang.  The error will not adversely impact any views. 

 

HARPER 3/46 (43661 Cypress Parkway):  10/4/06 Receipt of height verification from Wedge Construction.

 

BEAN 4/20 (15621 Forest View Rd.):  11/10/06 Receipt of letter describing construction delays to NHC permit 0705-0420 and revised drawings showing the change to the location of the driveway and garage entrance.  Mr. Roger Bean is requesting an extension of 266 days to his New Home Construction permit for construction delays caused by weather and delayed delivery of construction materials.  The Committee will extend the permit as requested but explained that any future request will require more detailed documentation as called for in the procedures. 

 

TRATHEN 7/26 (44400 O’Rorey’s Roost):  10/31/06 ADC letter of agreement regarding MEM permit 0705-0726.

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

 

TIM MURRAY 4/10 (15441 Forest View Rd.):  8/25/06 ADC letter regarding NHC permit 0905-0410.  The permit expired on 9/4/06.  No response has been received to date.

 

MOULTHROP 4/60 (15470 Forest View Dr.):  Issue of after the fact Minor Exterior Improvement application for a driveway, fence and garbage enclosure.  Leon explained that after the 9/16/06 meeting a small group of people, including himself, Gene Cady and community members, met informally with the Moulthrops on their property to formulate a plan to solve the screened parking issue. (Minutes 9/16/06).  Based on the conclusions of the group the Committee will ask the Moulthrops to resubmit the Minor Exterior Improvement application.

 

MCCONNELL 1/034 (14820 Navarro Way):  Phase II New Home Construction permit application review.  This application has been  materially revised since mailing and therefore will not be heard at this time.  At the request of the applicant, the revised application will be reviewed for informational purposes only.  Comments were received from Thompson (1/030), Heinzer (1/067), Rasch (1/068), Wm. Moores (1/070) and Datwyler (1/071).  Phil Roberts, architect, explained that the revised application will include a height variance request of about 3ft and a north side yard set back of 6ft which will result in a 23ft building separation with Kelada (1/035).  To mitigate the height the finished floor elevations are reduced and the proposed roof pitch is 2.5:12 instead of the minimum 4:12.  He explained that the height of the proposed structures would be 3.5ft below the eye level of a 5ft 6in. person standing on Navarro Way.  It will take 9-12 months to get a Coastal Development Permit and the presence of the Point Arena Mountain Beaver restricts construction to a seasonal period of July 1st  to December 15th.   Nik explained that he must also apply for a south side yard separation variance because they are proposing not to increase the 14ft set back by a distance equal to the height variance.  Nik stated his opinion that because the side yard variance request is substantial, the variance letter needs to explain clearly to the community why the house cannot be built within the CC&Rs.  Gordon stated that the neighbors would need to have hard data about space limitations, topography, etc., in order to understand why the variances are necessary.

 

ADJOURNMENT/NEXT MEETING

 

Leon moved to adjourn the meeting at 12:15PM.  Walt seconded and the motion passed 4-0.

 

The next meeting is scheduled for January 18th, 2007.